WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
Top public relations executive at Chinese technology firm Baidu apologizes after sparking backlashConforto homers to spark 6Japan Fisheries Agency proposes allowing commercial catching of fin whalesWalkers confirms major change to popular crispsCharlotte Hornets hire Celtics assistant coach Charles Lee to be their next head coachFast bowler Amir receives visa and will join Pakistan in Dublin for 2 T20sFamily make lastReal Madrid 2Japanese defense aircraft makes emergency landing after window glitch. No injuries were reportedHero father who 'protected his wife and daughter from sword